30 in 30: Day 15 - A Fanfic
Jan. 15th, 2010 03:19 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)


Day 15→A fanfic
Yeah... see, I don't read "fanfic". I don't follow "fanfic". I don't have anything to do with "fanfic" of any kind, really.
See, my way of looking at things is that I'd rather read the original author's vision of the characters and ideas for stories and leave it at that. As a writer, I'd much rather spend my time with my own characters and my own story ideas. I just don't get spending all of that time and creative energy with other people's characters/stories.
...
no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 02:54 am (UTC)Of course we're talking professional writers versus amateurs, but that's just a matter of an interesting story versus a boring story. I'm talking about taking on somebody else's characters.
An "original author's vision of the characters" is carried forward by other writers all the time in television production. David Chase wrote only a third of the episodes of The Sopranos, Aaron Sorkin wrote only half the episodes of The West Wing, Matthew Weiner wrote only half the episodes of Mad Men. And they're the ones who are famous for keeping an unusual amount of script control.
You can make a good living being a professional writer of what could (admittedly loosely) be described as fan fiction. There are literally hundreds of money-making novels and graphic novels published in the Star Wars (TM) universe. I imagine most long-running comic book series extend beyond their original creators. Any parent of a small child knows that not just movies but toys nowadays come with their own storybook series (yes, there are Lego novels for kids). The USA Network has been publishing original novels tied in to their successful TV series like Psych and Burn Notice. Their series "Monk" has been cancelled, but the detective lives on in Lee Goldberg's novels. And why not? Why shouldn't original novels based on a story-centered TV series be any less interesting than new TV episodes themselves, if the stories are strong enough? I think what AMC is doing is pretty neat. There are lots of ways to make money writing about someone else's characters, and I don't hold it against publishers for trying to satisfy the public's craving for stories, in whatever media they can get away with. I think it's pretty neat that a good writer can create something not that different from fan fiction -- that is, be given a starting setup and produce something entertaining from it. And I celebrate any amateur's attempt to do the same. (Although I'm glad I'm not required to read any of it. They're generally pretty boring.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 06:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Defined and Redefined
Date: 2010-01-17 01:42 am (UTC)But if fanfic is defined more narrowly: the writer must be a fan and the story must take existing characters and tell their further adventures BUT within the existing fictive universe . . . would Miller's Dark Knight, then, be fanfic? Moore's Swamp Thing? . . . Or is the extent of the re-invention involved in these stories such that they move outside of the earlier incarnation of the characters' universe . . . or do graphic novels fall outside of the discussion because of the collaborative nature of their creation?
Would love to hear Richard's ideas here, since some of his writing clearly is fanfic, regardless of the parameters of the definition . . . well, provided he could step back at least one step from himself to make those comments.
OK, have been thinking out loud here, because the topic, as revealed by y'all's two comments, has set my curiosity on fire.